Teacher Training (Science of Reading PD): Fidelity & Student Gains — Data

Reading changes lives. When a child learns to read with ease, doors open. Confidence grows. School feels possible. The Science of Reading gives us clear steps to make that happen. But success does not happen by luck. It happens when teachers get strong training, real coaching, and use the methods as designed. Fidelity matters. Data matters. Together, they lead to gains for students that you can see, measure, and celebrate.

1. PD completion rate (% of teachers finishing SoR training)

What this stat means

PD completion rate tells you how many teachers finished the full Science of Reading training. It is a simple count turned into a percent. If one hundred teachers enroll and eighty finish, the rate is eighty percent. This number is the first gate.

Without completion, there is no shared base of knowledge. It is like building a house. If the foundation is not poured, the walls cannot stand. A strong completion rate shows that your team is moving together with focus and care.

Why it matters for student gains

Students benefit when all adults speak the same language about reading. When most teachers finish the same training, they gain common terms, steps, and routines. Students then see the same moves across grades.

Sound mapping, blending routines, and decodable practice line up. That unity means less confusion, faster learning, and fewer gaps.

Completion is not the same as mastery, but it is the doorway to fidelity. High completion is linked to higher fidelity because people cannot use what they did not learn.

How to measure it clearly

Pick a clean start date and a clean end date for each PD cycle. Count only those who completed every required module, attended the live sessions, and passed any checks for understanding. Keep the denominator stable.

Use the number of staff who were assigned the PD, not the number who chose to show up. Report the rate by grade level, by school, and by role. Share monthly progress so leaders can remove barriers before the deadline.

How to raise the rate fast

Make the path easy and visible. Give teachers a simple schedule with short blocks and clear goals for each block. Build time into the workday so they do not have to learn at night. Offer small rewards for hitting milestones, like a shout-out or a classroom supply voucher.

Pair each teacher with a buddy to check in weekly. If someone falls behind, offer a catch-up session and a one-to-one plan. Keep the tone supportive, never shaming. Celebrate the finish line with a certificate and a moment of pride.

hen teachers feel valued and see that time is protected, completion rises, fidelity improves, and students win.

2. Average PD seat time (hours per teacher)

What this stat means

Average PD seat time is the typical number of hours each teacher spends in the training. It covers live sessions, self-paced modules, and practice labs. The goal is not to chase a huge number.

The goal is the right dose to build skills that stick. A balanced plan blends learn, watch, do, and reflect. Short, focused chunks beat long marathons.

Seat time should link directly to the core components of the Science of Reading, like phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension routines.

Why it matters for student gains

Reading instruction is procedural. Teachers need time to learn the moves, rehearse them, and get feedback. Enough seat time allows for repetition and retrieval, which makes learning durable. When teachers get enough practice time, they move from knowing to doing.

They can lead sound boxes with clear language, deliver explicit phonics with brisk pacing, and guide decodable text reading with precise corrective feedback.

Students then get more accurate instruction and grow faster in accuracy and fluency.

How to measure it clearly

Track hours by type. Note how many hours are knowledge building, how many are modeling, how many are rehearsal, and how many are classroom application with reflection. The average should reflect real participation, not just registration.

Use simple logs tied to your PD platform. Sample a few teachers to verify logs with calendars. Look at the spread, not just the average. A high average can hide big gaps. Aim for a tight band so most teachers get the full, intended dose.

How to raise the right dose

Map hours to outcomes. Decide the minimum hours needed for each core routine and plan backward. Keep sessions to ninety minutes or less and include at least one rehearsal per session. Build micro-learning into common planning time.

Use video exemplars to speed the modeling step. Follow each module with a next-day classroom try and a short reflection. Remove low-value time, like long lectures with no practice. Protect workday PD time so teachers do not stack hours after school.

When seat time is right-sized and focused on practice, teacher skill moves up and students gain more, faster.

3. Coaching participation rate (% receiving coaching)

What this stat means

Coaching participation rate shows the share of teachers who are actually getting coaching after PD. It counts real coaching, not casual drop-ins. Coaching is planned, focused, and tied to a skill.

This stat matters because training alone is not enough. People change when someone helps them turn ideas into habits.

A high rate means most teachers are not on their own. They have a coach to plan, observe, debrief, and plan again.

Why it matters for student gains

The Science of Reading lives in small moves done well every day. The words you use in a blending routine, the pace of your choral response, the order of your corrections, the way you connect speech sounds to print, all of it matters.

Coaching helps teachers sharpen these micro-moves. With coaching, errors drop and correct routines stick. Students receive cleaner practice and more success. That leads to faster growth in letter-sound mapping, decoding accuracy, oral reading fluency, and comprehension checks.

A strong coaching net also spreads effective habits across the team, so gains scale beyond one classroom.

How to measure it clearly

Define coaching clearly before you count it. A coaching cycle should include a goal tied to a rubric, a pre-brief, a live or video observation, and a debrief with action steps. Count teachers as “participating” only if they complete at least one full cycle in the time window.

Report the rate monthly and show it by grade, by school, and by coach. Track first-time participants and repeat participants. The trend should rise until most teachers are covered, then hold steady as cycles repeat.

How to raise the rate with care

Make coaching normal, not special. Put it on the master schedule. Start with voluntary sign-ups to build trust, then widen. Keep goals tiny and concrete, such as tightening the wording of a phoneme segmentation routine or increasing the number of student response reps per minute.

Use video when live schedules clash. Share one quick win story each week so teachers see the payoff. Protect a warm tone. Coaches should ask, not tell. They should model, co-teach, and leave with a simple next step.

When coaching is safe, helpful, and fast, more teachers join in. As participation grows, fidelity rises and student gains follow.

4. Coaching dosage (avg coaching hours per teacher)

What this stat means

Coaching dosage is the average number of hours each teacher spends in real coaching across a set period. It includes goal setting, classroom observation, modeling, co-teaching, and debrief time. It does not include hallway chats or emails.

This number tells you if teachers are getting enough guided practice to make new habits stick. With the Science of Reading, habits are everything. The exact words used to cue phonemes, the flow of blending practice, the timing of error correction, the hand signals for segmenting, all of these require repetition with feedback.

Dosage is the fuel that turns one-off training into daily mastery.

Why it matters for student gains

Students feel the effect of coaching even if they never meet the coach. When a teacher receives steady coaching, lessons run with crisp pacing, high response rates, and accurate routines.

That means more correct practice trials per minute and fewer moments of confusion. Young readers then build automaticity faster. They map sounds to letters more reliably, decode with fewer slips, and read connected text with rising accuracy and speed.

Over weeks, this shows up as growth in foundational measures like phonemic awareness and nonsense word fluency, and later as stronger oral reading fluency and comprehension. A low dosage often leads to uneven use of routines.

A steady, moderate dosage creates consistency, which is the friend of student progress.

How to measure it clearly

Define the window, such as one quarter or one semester. Count the minutes spent in coaching activities tied to a specific, documented goal. Track minutes by activity type so you can see the mix of modeling, observation, and feedback.

Convert minutes to hours and average across all teachers assigned to coaching, not just those who participate. Report the mean and the median so outliers do not hide the true picture. Compare dosage by grade level and by coach.

Tie dosage to changes in fidelity scores and student outcomes to see the threshold where gains become reliable.

How to raise dosage without overload

Put coaching blocks on the master schedule, just like classes. Keep each touch short, focused, and recurring. Ten to fifteen minutes of planning, twenty minutes of observation, and a tight ten-minute debrief can move mountains if done weekly.

Use video to capture lessons when live visits clash with schedules. Encourage co-teaching for tricky routines so teachers feel support in the moment. Set one bite-size goal per cycle, such as tightening corrective feedback language for blending errors.

End every session with a micro-action to try the next day. When coaching is small, regular, and safe, teachers welcome more of it. Dosage rises, fidelity strengthens, and student growth accelerates.

5. Fidelity rubric mean score (1–4 scale)

What this stat means

The fidelity rubric mean score is the average rating across classrooms on a clear, behavior-based rubric for Science of Reading routines. A four might indicate precise language, correct sequence, high student engagement, and timely corrections.

A one might show missing steps, vague prompts, or low response rates. The mean shows the overall health of implementation. It is not a judgment of effort. It is a snapshot of what students actually experience.

Because the Science of Reading relies on explicit routines, a well-built rubric makes fidelity visible and fair.

Why it matters for student gains

Children learn to read through accurate practice. If routines are loose, students practice the wrong thing or get too few correct repetitions. When fidelity is high, students receive the right model, attempt at the right level, and immediate, specific feedback.

Over time, this lowers cognitive load and builds automatic decoding. Gains then appear in accuracy, speed, and confidence. A rising mean score often comes before a rise in student data, acting as an early warning that instruction is getting stronger.

A slipping mean score warns you that drift has started and students may soon plateau.

How to measure it clearly

Use a short, specific rubric for each routine you care about, such as phoneme segmentation, explicit phonics, decodable text practice, or fluency work. Train observers with video so they agree on what each rating looks like.

Aim for at least two observations per teacher per month during the first term of implementation. Score in the moment, capture quick notes, and share the score and evidence with the teacher the same day. Average scores at the classroom, grade, and school levels.

Track the mean over time and pair it with the standard deviation so you can see if the team is moving together or spreading out.

How to raise the mean score fast

Choose one rubric row to improve at a time. If pacing drags, rehearse a shorter teacher script and add choral responses to lift the number of practice trials. If correction steps are messy, script the exact words and practice them with a timer.

Use live modeling and side-by-side co-teaching to show what a level four looks like. Keep feedback warm and specific. Celebrate moves, not people, so the focus stays on practice. Post a weekly “move of the week” with a tiny video clip.

As more classrooms hit consistent level three and level four ratings, the mean climbs and student gains follow close behind.

6. Fidelity pass rate (% meeting fidelity threshold)

What this stat means

The fidelity pass rate is the percent of classrooms that meet or exceed the agreed threshold on the fidelity rubric. Many teams set the bar at a three on a four-point scale for all priority routines.

This stat tells you how many students are in rooms where instruction is strong enough to drive gains now.

While the mean score shows the center, the pass rate shows the reach. You want a rising pass rate so the typical child, not just the child in a few rooms, gets high-quality instruction every day.

Why it matters for student gains

A high pass rate spreads reliable instruction across the building. That means fewer pockets of struggle and fewer students who fall behind because of uneven teaching.

When most classrooms meet the bar, students move between grades without losing ground, interventions are targeted rather than universal, and growth is steady in every wing of the school. Parents see consistency.

Teachers can plan with confidence. Leaders can focus on support rather than firefighting. In reading, scale matters. Gains that touch every classroom raise the whole curve, not just the top.

How to measure it clearly

Set the threshold in advance and keep it stable for at least one term. Define which routines count for the pass. Collect fidelity data on a set cadence, such as twice monthly. Count classrooms as “passing” only if they meet the bar on all priority routines in the observation window.

Report the pass rate by grade level and by routine to spot weak links. Track progress across months and connect it to changes in student benchmarks so you can see how shifts in fidelity show up in outcomes.

Look at cohort stability too, since staff changes can alter the rate.

How to raise the pass rate with intent

Target support where the pass rate is lowest. Use a sprint model for one grade at a time. Script the routine, model it live, rehearse with teachers, and observe two times in one week to lock the habit. Provide ready-to-use materials so teachers can focus on delivery.

Offer quick, same-day coaching for any classroom that misses the bar, with a plan to re-check within a week. Share simple, positive data in staff meetings so progress feels real. Keep the bar public and steady.

As more rooms cross the line, the pass rate climbs, and with it, student growth becomes the norm rather than the exception.

7. Inter-observer agreement on fidelity (%)

What this stat means

Inter-observer agreement shows how often two trained observers give the same ratings when they watch the same lesson. It is a percent score. If both observers mark the rubric in the same way most of the time, the score is high.

This matters because a fidelity rubric only helps when it is used in a fair and steady way. If one observer is strict and another is loose, teachers will not trust the data. Students will get mixed signals.

Agreement gives everyone confidence that the numbers reflect real classroom practice, not the mood of the day.

Why it matters for student gains

Clear and steady feedback helps teachers improve faster. When observers agree, coaching is consistent. Teachers know exactly what a strong phoneme segmentation routine looks like, what counts as precise corrective feedback, and what pacing should sound like.

This lets them practice the right moves without guessing. In turn, children get the same high-quality routine every day. They respond more, practice more, and make fewer errors.

Over time, this steady practice leads to better letter-sound mapping, faster decoding, and stronger fluency. A high agreement rate is a quiet engine behind those gains.

How to measure it clearly

Pick a sample of classrooms each month. Send two observers to watch the same routine within the same week. Have both score independently, then compare line by line on the rubric. Count the number of matching ratings and divide by the total number of ratings to get the percent agreement.

Track the overall rate and also look at which rubric rows show the most mismatch. Keep a simple log with date, routine, grade, and observer pair. Set a target, such as ninety percent agreement, and hold short norming sessions until you hit it.

How to raise agreement quickly

Norm with video first. Watch a short clip of a single routine. Pause and rate each row. Show and discuss the exact evidence that justifies the score. Write sample notes that match the rating language, so words and numbers line up.

Create a tiny bank of anchor clips for levels one through four. Revisit them each month to keep drift low. When you visit live classrooms, script the steps you will look for before you enter. After the observation, compare evidence, not opinions.

If you disagree, return to the rubric language and anchor clips. Over a few cycles, your team will start to speak with one voice. That shared voice builds teacher trust, speeds coaching, and keeps student learning on track.

8. Lesson plan alignment with SoR components (%)

What this stat means

Lesson plan alignment tells you what percent of plans include the key parts of the Science of Reading. It answers a simple question. Do plans include phonemic awareness, explicit phonics with cumulative review, decodable text practice at the right level, fluency work, vocabulary, and a short comprehension check?

Plans do not teach on their own, but they guide daily action. If the plan leaves out a part, the day often leaves it out too. This stat turns invisible planning into visible data.

Why it matters for student gains

Children need the full set of reading parts to grow. If phonemic awareness is missing, blending stalls. If decodable text is skipped, students guess from pictures or context. If there is no cumulative review, new skills fade.

When plans include all core parts, teachers are more likely to teach the sequence as designed. Students then get the right mix of accuracy, practice, and retrieval. This makes learning stick.

Over weeks, aligned plans lead to higher fidelity scores and stronger growth in decoding accuracy, nonsense word fluency, oral reading fluency, and later comprehension.

How to measure it clearly

Create a short checklist that mirrors your tier-one model. It should be quick to score. For each plan, mark yes or no for each core component. Review a random sample each week across grades. Count the total yes marks and divide by total possible marks to get the alignment percent.

Also track the percent of plans that include all required parts. Share patterns by grade level so teams can fix gaps. Pair plan checks with short classroom walks to see if plans match practice. If plans are aligned but practice is not, coaching should shift to execution.

If plans are not aligned, fix the template and planning routines first.

How to raise alignment without adding load

Give teachers a simple plan template that bakes in the SoR parts. Add suggested timings for each block and space for the exact script for tricky moves like corrective feedback.

Provide a weekly planning guide that points to the right decodables and word lists based on the phonics scope and sequence. During common planning, have one teacher model how to fill out the template in ten minutes.

Store strong plans in a shared folder so no one starts from zero. Keep the focus on fit and flow, not length. When planning gets easier and clearer, alignment rises. As alignment rises, daily instruction becomes complete and students get the full diet they need to thrive.

9. Explicit phonics minutes per day (avg)

What this stat means

Explicit phonics minutes per day is the average number of minutes a class spends on direct, systematic phonics instruction. This is the time where the teacher clearly teaches sound-symbol links, blending, segmenting, and spelling patterns, and students practice with high response rates.

It does not include general reading time or centers without direct instruction. The number matters because phonics skills grow with focused, repeated practice. A small daily block often beats a long block once in a while.

The goal is consistent, brisk, and cumulative instruction.

Why it matters for student gains

Phonics is the bridge from spoken language to print. When students get enough daily minutes in well-sequenced phonics, they move from slow, effortful decoding to automatic word reading. This frees brain power for meaning.

Without enough minutes, even a good routine cannot build the speed and accuracy children need. With enough minutes, tied to the right scope and sequence, students climb the ladder from simple to complex patterns with confidence.

You will see gains in letter-sound accuracy, nonsense word fluency, real word reading, and spelling. Later, you will see smoother oral reading and stronger comprehension because decoding is no longer a bottleneck.

How to measure it clearly

Use short observation snapshots. Note the start and end times of the explicit phonics block. Record whether the teaching matched the planned pattern for the day. Do this twice a week for each grade during the first months of implementation, then weekly as routines settle.

Average the minutes across classrooms to get the daily number for each grade.

Also track student response opportunities per minute so you see if time is active, not passive. Share the data with teachers in simple graphs that show time and response rates rising together.

How to raise minutes without losing quality

Protect a daily phonics block on the master schedule. Keep it tight, around twenty to thirty minutes in the early grades, and match it to your scope and sequence. Script transitions to save time. Use choral responses, partner practice, and quick whiteboard checks to lift the number of correct repetitions.

Build in cumulative review so older patterns stay fresh. If time is getting squeezed, look at the day and remove low-value activities. Offer model lessons that show how to fit the routine into the set time.

Help teachers prep materials in advance, with word cards and decodables grouped by pattern. When minutes are steady and active, students gain speed and confidence with print, and the rest of reading opens up.

10. Decodable text usage rate (% of lessons)

What this stat means

Decodable text usage rate shows the percent of lessons where students read books or passages that match the phonics patterns they have been taught. In a high-quality Science of Reading block, students practice new and review patterns in print that they can actually decode.

A strong rate means teachers choose texts where most words follow the scope and sequence. This is not about making reading easy. It is about making reading fair, so children can apply what they know and build accuracy and speed.

When the rate is low, students face many words with patterns they have not learned. They start to guess. Guessing feels fast in the moment, but it slows real growth.

Why it matters for student gains

Young readers need hundreds of successful decoding trials. Decodable texts provide those trials without distractions. When students read decodable lines tied to taught patterns, they use letter-sound knowledge and blending routines, not pictures or context clues.

This practice builds the brain pathways for automatic word reading. Over weeks, you see gains in nonsense word fluency, real word accuracy, and oral reading fluency. Confidence also rises because success is frequent and visible.

Later, as decoding firms up, students can handle more complex trade books with less strain. If decodables are rare in lessons, the skill pipeline leaks. Children work hard but make slow progress because practice does not match instruction.

How to measure it clearly

Pick a sample of literacy blocks each week. Note whether the main student reading time uses decodable texts aligned to current or review patterns in the scope and sequence. Mark yes only when the match is tight.

Keep a simple log that records date, grade, phonics pattern of the week, and the title used. Divide the number of aligned lessons by the total lessons observed to find the percent. Pair the rate with short checks of text accuracy in student reading to confirm that alignment produces success.

Share the data with grade teams so they can adjust book bins and lesson plans quickly.

How to raise the rate with smart systems

Build a living map that links each week of the scope and sequence to specific decodable texts and page ranges. Label classroom book bins by pattern, not level. During planning, pick the day’s text right after scripting the phonics lesson.

Keep a small set of high-utility decodables ready for quick swaps when time runs short. Teach students simple routines for rereading the same passage across days with a new focus each time, like accuracy first, then phrasing, then expression.

Provide a short parent note that explains decodable practice so families support it at home. When texts match taught patterns day after day, students stop guessing and start reading with power.

11. Corrective feedback frequency (per lesson)

What this stat means

Corrective feedback frequency is how often a teacher gives quick, clear corrections during reading or phonics practice. In strong instruction, errors are normal and useful. The teacher notices the slip, gives a short model, has the student try again, and confirms the correct response.

This cycle takes seconds, not minutes. A healthy frequency shows that the teacher is listening closely and acting fast. It also shows that students feel safe to respond out loud and take risks. Too few corrections may mean low monitoring or too much silent work.

Too many may signal tasks that are too hard. The goal is a steady flow of precise, brief feedback that keeps practice clean.

Why it matters for student gains

Practice does not make perfect. Perfect practice makes progress. When errors go uncorrected, students practice the wrong sounds or patterns and wire in mistakes. When feedback is quick and exact, the brain updates.

The right pathway gets stronger. Over time, this shows up as higher decoding accuracy, fewer reversals, and smoother oral reading. Corrective feedback also builds trust. Students learn that errors are part of learning and that help is near.

They try more, respond more, and get more successful reps. With dozens of clean trials each day, growth speeds up across the board.

How to measure it clearly

During short observation windows, tally each corrective feedback event and note the routine context, such as blending, dictation, or decodable reading. Record whether the teacher used a full correction sequence: stop, model, lead, test, and return to the reading.

Capture lesson length to compute feedback events per minute. Track the ratio of corrections to total response opportunities. Review the data by grade and routine to spot places where feedback is thin.

Compare frequency trends with fidelity scores and student accuracy checks to find the sweet spot for your team.

How to raise the quality and the cadence

Script a standard correction for each routine so words are automatic under pressure. Practice the script with a timer until it takes ten seconds or less. Use choral and partner responses so errors surface in the open where they can be fixed.

Pre-plan tricky words in a text and rehearse likely corrections before class begins. Teach students to expect and welcome a redo as a normal part of reading. After each lesson, jot one note about a correction that worked well and one tweak for next time.

Small, steady improvements in feedback skill create cleaner practice, and cleaner practice delivers stronger gains.

12. Cumulative review inclusion rate (% of lessons)

What this stat means

Cumulative review inclusion rate tells you what percent of lessons include fast practice with older skills, not just new skills. In the Science of Reading, students need spaced, mixed review to keep patterns alive.

Without review, last month’s learning fades and new learning wobbles on a weak base. A strong rate means most lessons start or end with a quick cycle of known letter-sound links, word reading, and spelling with previously taught patterns.

The review is short, brisk, and varied. It feels like a warm-up for the brain.

Why it matters for student gains

Memory needs retrieval to stay strong. Cumulative review gives students many low-stress chances to pull up old learning and use it. This lowers cognitive load during new tasks because older patterns fire without effort.

You see the effect in higher accuracy, faster blending, and smoother movement through the scope and sequence. Students struggle less when texts mix old and new patterns because nothing feels brand new.

Over weeks, classes with steady review show more stable gains in nonsense word fluency, real word reading, and dictation accuracy. The growth looks calm and steady rather than spiky and fragile.

How to measure it clearly

During plan checks and short visits, mark whether the lesson includes at least three minutes of mixed review tied to previous weeks in the scope and sequence. Note the mode used, such as sound deck, word reading, timed word lists, or quick dictation.

Track the percent of lessons with review and the average minutes spent. Also record variety across the week so review stays fresh. Pair the rate with simple student probes that sample retention of past patterns.

If review is present but retention is weak, the issue may be pace, difficulty, or engagement rather than inclusion alone.

How to raise inclusion with zero fluff

Set a daily two to five minute review slot on the schedule and protect it. Prepare tiny decks of cards grouped by past patterns and rotate them. Use a visual calendar that lists the last eight weeks of patterns and pull items from three different weeks each day.

Keep the tone fast and joyful with choral responses and quick checks. If time is tight, make the review your transition into the new lesson. Train students to lead parts of the review, like flashing the deck or calling out a spelling check.

When review becomes a habit, accuracy climbs, forgetting drops, and new learning lands on solid ground.

13. Small-group instruction dosage (minutes/week)

What this stat means

Small-group instruction dosage is the total minutes per week that students spend in targeted, teacher-led groups based on their current reading needs. In early reading, needs can vary widely within a class. Some children are still firming up phoneme blending.

thers are ready for complex vowel patterns. Small groups let the teacher match tasks to the child’s just-right level. Dosage shows whether students are actually getting that chance often enough to make a difference.

A good number is not random. It reflects the time needed to deliver short, precise lessons with many chances to respond and immediate feedback.

Why it matters for student gains

Whole-group instruction builds shared knowledge and routines. Small-group time fills gaps and stretches growth. When students receive regular, focused minutes at their level, errors drop because tasks are neither too hard nor too easy.

The teacher can fine-tune pacing, model tricky mouth positions for sounds, choose decodables that fit the group’s pattern focus, and push for more accurate responses. This kind of teaching is efficient. It produces many correct trials in a short time.

Over weeks, you see faster movement from high-risk to low-risk bands, higher percent at or above benchmark, and stronger gains on foundational measures. Without enough small-group minutes, some students stall while others surge, and the gap widens.

How to measure it clearly

Build a simple weekly schedule that lists each group, the focus skill, the planned minutes, and the actual minutes delivered. Use a quick digital tracker or a clipboard log to record real minutes and lessons taught.

Calculate minutes per student and per group, not just total minutes, so every child’s access is visible. Review dosage by risk level and ensure that students who are furthest behind receive more frequent, shorter sessions with clear goals.

Pair dosage data with quick progress checks so you can see the link between time delivered and skill growth.

How to raise dosage while protecting energy

Trim transitions so more minutes land in teaching, not moving. Keep groups small, around three to five students, and lessons tight at ten to fifteen minutes. Pre-sort decodables, word lists, and dictation items in labeled folders by pattern so setup takes seconds.

Use a visual rotation chart so students move on a signal without reminders. Teach a standard opening routine that starts the moment students sit, such as a one-minute sound review. Build a bank of mini-lessons for common gaps so planning is fast.

When groups meet often, even for short bursts, students collect many correct reps and growth speeds up for those who need it most.

14. Progress monitoring frequency (assessments/month)

What this stat means

Progress monitoring frequency is how often you check student reading skills with short, reliable assessments each month. These checks are quick, focused, and tied to the skills you teach, such as phonemic awareness, decoding accuracy, and oral reading fluency.

The goal is to see if instruction is working right now, not months from now. Think of it like a compass on a hike. You glance at it often so you do not drift off course.

A steady cadence, such as two to four short checks per month for students who need extra help and one to two for students on track, keeps decisions fresh and grounded in real performance.

Why it matters for student gains

Children grow at different speeds. Without frequent checks, small problems hide until they become big.

Regular progress monitoring catches slips early. If a student’s decoding growth slows, you can adjust small-group work, change the decodables, or add a few extra practice reps right away. When students see their own charts move up, they feel proud and stay motivated.

Teachers feel confident because they can link today’s instruction to this week’s data. Over time, steady monitoring helps more students move from high risk to low risk and lifts the percent at or above benchmark. It also reduces guesswork. You use facts, not feelings, to guide support.

How to measure it clearly

Set a calendar for the term with exact weeks when checks happen. Choose brief, valid measures that match the skill focus, and train staff to give them the same way each time. Record scores the same day in a simple dashboard and tag each score with the date and the current instructional focus.

Look at the number of checks per student and the average gap in days between checks. Review trends by grade, risk level, and classroom. If a student misses a check, schedule a make-up within the same week so data stays current.

How to raise frequency without stress

Make the checks tiny and routine. Use two to three minute probes and do them during arrival, transitions, or the first minutes of small group. Prepare folders with all materials labeled by week so staff can start at once.

Teach students the routine so the process is calm and quick. Share results with the student in simple words and set one mini-goal for the next check. Tie checks to action. If scores stall, change one thing in instruction within forty eight hours and see if the next check improves.

When progress monitoring becomes a normal rhythm, instruction gets sharper and student growth speeds up.

15. Tier 2 intervention fidelity (% sessions delivered as designed)

What this stat means

Tier 2 intervention fidelity is the percent of intervention sessions that follow the program as written, with the right group size, minutes, order of activities, and teacher language. This stat does not judge teacher effort. It checks if the recipe is followed so the promise of the program has a fair chance to work.

The measure covers session setup, pacing, practice opportunities, corrective feedback, and the use of aligned decodables or word lists. Because Tier 2 time is precious and short, even small drifts can weaken the effect.

Why it matters for student gains

Students in Tier 2 need targeted, high quality practice to catch up. If the group is too big, if minutes are cut, or if the sequence is changed, students get fewer correct trials and less feedback. That slows growth and keeps them stuck in risk zones.

When fidelity is high, lessons are crisp, the difficulty is just right, and students receive many chances to respond with fast, clean corrections. Over weeks, this shows up as stronger gains in phonemic awareness, decoding accuracy, nonsense word fluency, and early oral reading fluency.

High fidelity also helps you judge the program fairly. If students are not growing even with strong fidelity, you can adjust the match of program to need with confidence.

How to measure it clearly

Use a short observation checklist specific to your Tier 2 program. Include items for group size, minutes, sequence, response rates, and correction steps. Visit each group at least twice a month. Score in the moment and record a pass only when all critical items are met.

Track the percent of sessions that meet the bar by group and by school. Pair fidelity data with student progress graphs so teams can see the link between delivery and growth.

If fidelity dips, check schedules, room setups, and materials first, as these often block smooth delivery.

How to raise fidelity quickly

Protect the full minutes on the master schedule and avoid pull-outs during intervention time. Keep group sizes small, ideally three to five students, and stable for at least four weeks. Prepare materials in labeled bins so setup takes less than a minute.

Script teacher language for hard parts and rehearse it. Use a timer to keep a brisk pace. Offer quick coaching right after a visit with one tiny action step for the next day. Celebrate clean delivery with a simple shout-out and share short video clips of strong sessions so others can copy the moves.

With steady fidelity, Tier 2 becomes a true booster, and students climb faster toward grade level.

16. Letter-sound accuracy growth (percentage-point gain)

What this stat means

Letter-sound accuracy growth tracks how many more letter-sound pairs a student can name and produce correctly over a set time. It is a simple percentage-point gain from one check to the next. This measure sits at the heart of early reading.

If students map sounds to letters with high accuracy, everything else in decoding becomes easier. Accuracy here means the student says the correct sound quickly without adding extra sounds and can use that link in both reading and spelling tasks.

You can track growth for consonants, short vowels, digraphs, blends, and later, vowel teams and other complex patterns.

Why it matters for student gains

Reading is about recognizing patterns in print fast and right. When letter-sound links are shaky, students guess or move slowly. This drains energy needed for meaning. As accuracy grows, students blend with less effort, read decodables with fewer errors, and feel success more often.

You will see cleaner nonsense word fluency because students can apply each sound without pause. Spelling improves because the same links guide encoding. Gains here are early wins that predict smoother progress later in oral reading and comprehension.

If growth stalls at this level, the whole reading journey feels hard.

How to measure it clearly

Use quick probes that show letters or graphemes in a random order and ask for the sounds. Keep the list tied to your scope and sequence so you test what you teach. Set a time limit to capture automaticity and mark each response as correct or incorrect.

Convert to a percent and track the change across weeks. Create sub-scores by pattern type so instruction can target exact gaps. Pair the probe with a short dictation of a few words to confirm that the links work in spelling too.

Share a simple chart with the student so they can see the line go up and stay motivated.

How to raise accuracy with smart practice

Teach with clear mouth cues and precise sounds. Avoid adding extra vowel sounds to consonants. Use brief, daily drills with high response rates and immediate corrections. Mix old and new patterns so review is constant.

Follow the “I do, we do, you do” flow, then cycle back for quick retrieval later in the lesson. Add one minute of home practice with a tiny card set focused on that week’s patterns and show families exactly how to prompt.

In small group, select decodables that hit the target patterns many times to boost correct reps. When practice is clean, short, and frequent, letter-sound accuracy climbs and decoding takes off.

17. Phonemic awareness score gain (scaled score)

What this stat means

Phonemic awareness score gain shows the change in how well students can hear, pull apart, blend, and change the tiny sounds in words. It is measured with a scaled score so you can compare growth over time even if the tasks get a bit harder.

These skills include hearing the first sound in a word, blending sounds to make a word, breaking a word into sounds, and swapping one sound for another to make a new word. No letters are needed for these tasks. This is ear and mouth work.

When you track the gain, you see if students are getting stronger at the base skill that makes phonics click later. A rising scaled score tells you that practice is doing its job and that the sound system in the brain is tuning up.

Why it matters for student gains

If students cannot hear and handle sounds, they struggle to connect those sounds to letters. Blending feels slow. Spelling feels like a guess. Strong phonemic awareness makes decoding smoother because students can hold sounds in order and push them together to read a word.

It also helps spelling because students can pull sounds apart and match each to a grapheme with less effort. Gains here often lead to quicker lifts in letter-sound accuracy, nonsense word fluency, and early decodable reading.

For older learners who missed early steps, improved phonemic awareness can unlock stalled decoding and rebuild confidence fast. When you see steady growth in this stat, classroom routines like oral blending lines, segmenting with chips, and quick sound substitution drills are doing real work.

How to measure it clearly

Pick a brief, valid measure that includes blending, segmenting, and manipulation. Use the same tool every two to four weeks for students who need support and every six to eight weeks for students on track.

Give the probe one-on-one in a quiet corner and score in the moment. Convert raw scores to scaled scores so gains are fair across forms. Record the date, the tasks included, and any notes about student attention.

Look for growth of several scaled score points per check for students receiving extra practice. Compare class averages across months to see if whole-group routines are lifting everyone.

How to raise gains with tight practice

Teach a short, daily routine of two to five minutes. Keep tasks oral and fast. Start with compound words and syllables if needed, then move to phonemes. Use your hands, chips, or finger taps to make sounds concrete, then fade supports as students improve.

Say only the pure sounds. Model once, practice three to five quick items, correct with a clear model and immediate retry, then move on. Link work to print right after the oral warm-up so students apply the skill during phonics.

In small groups, match tasks to the exact weak spot. If blending is slow, run brisk blending lines.

If segmenting is fuzzy, practice two- and three-sound words with quick checks. Keep it short, keep it daily, and chart the scaled score so students can see their own climb.

18. Nonsense Word Fluency (NWF) gain (corrects per min)

What this stat means

NWF gain shows how many more made-up words a student can read correctly in one minute over time. These words are not real, like “biv” or “lat,” so students must rely on letter-sound knowledge and blending.

Guessing from meaning does not help. That is why the score is a strong sign of decoding skill. The measure is reported as corrects per minute, which captures both accuracy and speed. A rising number means students are mapping sounds to print quickly and blending on the fly.

This is the raw engine of early reading.

Why it matters for student gains

When students can decode unfamiliar words fast, real reading becomes easier. They do not stall on new words in decodables or grade-level text. They keep their place, hold the sentence in mind, and move forward.

Gains in NWF often show up before big jumps in oral reading fluency because this is the cleanest look at the decoding muscle. It also predicts spelling growth because the same sound-symbol links support encoding.

If NWF gain is flat, students will likely hit a wall later with connected text. If it rises, you can expect smoother movement through the phonics scope and sequence and better outcomes on benchmark checks.

How to measure it clearly

Use a standard one-minute probe tied to your scope and sequence. Give it every two to four weeks for students who need support and monthly for students on track. Score every letter-sound read correctly and every whole word read correctly.

Note common error types, such as stopping after the first sound or adding extra sounds. Track growth as the change in corrects per minute from one check to the next and across the term.

Look at classroom averages and risk bands so you can target help where it is needed most. Compare NWF gain to your explicit phonics minutes and decodable usage rate to find patterns.

How to raise NWF fast and fairly

Tighten daily phonics routines. Teach the week’s pattern with clear modeling, then drive high response rates with choral reads, partner reads, and rapid word lists. Use decodables that load the target pattern so students get dozens of correct trials.

Run micro-drills on stuck spots, like final blends or vowel teams, for two minutes a day. Script a quick correction that includes model, lead, and test so errors do not linger. In small groups, practice timed but calm word reading, aiming for smooth blending rather than speed alone.

Celebrate growth in corrects per minute and show students their personal graph. When practice is aligned, frequent, and corrected fast, the NWF line climbs.

19. Oral Reading Fluency (ORF) gain (WCPM)

What this stat means

ORF gain tracks how many more words correct per minute a student reads in connected text over time. Unlike NWF, ORF uses real sentences and paragraphs. The score blends accuracy, rate, and some expression.

A rising WCPM shows that decoding has become automatic enough for the student to keep a steady pace and hold meaning as they read. ORF is often checked several times a year to see if students are on a path to read grade-level text with ease.

It is a simple number, but it reflects many skills working together.

Why it matters for student gains

Fluency frees the mind for meaning. When a student reads with accuracy and a steady pace, they can think about the story, learn new facts, and answer questions. If ORF is low, even smart students may look weak in comprehension because they are spending all their energy on decoding.

As ORF goes up, comprehension chances improve because working memory is no longer overloaded. Gains here also reflect solid instruction in phonics, practice with decodables, and repeated reading routines.

ORF is a bridge between early skills and full reading. Seeing it rise tells you your system is working from sounds to words to connected text.

How to measure it clearly

Use grade-appropriate passages with clear scoring rules. Give a one-minute read, mark errors, and calculate words correct per minute. For students who need added support, check every month. For others, check each term.

Keep passage difficulty steady across checks when possible or use equated sets. Record not just the number but also common error patterns, where the student slowed, and whether phrasing was smooth.

Chart growth against classroom routines such as repeated reading, phrasing practice, and vocabulary work. Compare ORF gains to NWF gains to see if decoding is the limiter or if practice with connected text is the missing piece.

How to raise ORF with purpose

Keep daily decoding strong, then add short, repeated readings of connected text that students can read with high success.

Start slightly below frustration level and aim for errors to be rare. Have students read the same passage several times across days with a different focus each time, such as accuracy first, then phrasing, then expression.

Model a fluent read so students can hear the target. Use quick echo reading and choral lines to build confidence. Teach phrasing by marking natural pauses and practicing short chunks. Build word knowledge by previewing two or three key words before the read.

Celebrate WCPM gains while guarding accuracy. As decoding and practice with real text improve, ORF rises and comprehension opens up.

20. Decoding accuracy gain (% correct on grade-level words)

What this stat means

Decoding accuracy gain shows the change in percent correct when students read a list of grade-level words that match the taught patterns. It focuses on accuracy first, not speed. You present a short list, the student reads each word aloud, and you mark right or wrong.

The percent shows how well the student can use sound-symbol links to read real words.

The gain shows whether instruction is closing gaps over weeks. This number is a clean mirror of classroom practice because it rises when modeling, guided practice, and corrective feedback are tight and frequent.

Why it matters for student gains

Accurate decoding is the doorway to fluent reading. If accuracy is weak, the student burns energy on each word and cannot hold the sentence in mind. When accuracy climbs, every read becomes easier.

Students stop guessing, keep their place, and feel in control. This builds confidence, lowers stress, and invites more practice. Over time, higher accuracy leads to better NWF and ORF scores, stronger spelling, and clearer comprehension because words no longer block meaning.

Accuracy is also fair to measure. It does not punish thoughtful students who read with care. It simply checks if the skill is there.

How to measure it clearly

Use ten to twenty real words tied to your scope and sequence. Keep the mix steady across checks so comparisons are fair. Note error types, like vowel confusion or skipped endings, to guide instruction.

Convert to a percent and chart the gain every two to four weeks for students who need support, and each term for those on track. Look for steady climbs rather than big spikes. Pair accuracy checks with short dictation to see if the same patterns hold when spelling.

If accuracy plateaus, adjust the teaching sequence, the decodables, or the amount of cumulative review.

How to raise accuracy with daily habits

Start each phonics block with a one-minute accuracy warm-up using words from current and past patterns. Model one, do three together, then have students try three alone with fast corrections.

In small groups, select texts and word lists that load the tricky pattern many times so students get dozens of correct reps. Script precise language for corrections and rehearse it so fixes are quick.

Teach students to track each sound with their finger or a small tool, then fade supports as accuracy firms up. End with a short victory read so students feel success. Day by day, clean practice lifts accuracy and unlocks the rest of reading.

21. Spelling pattern mastery gain (% correct)

What this stat means

Spelling pattern mastery gain tracks the change in percent correct on short spelling checks that match taught phonics patterns. It shows whether students can move from reading to writing the same sounds.

Encoding tests the same links in reverse, which is a strong test of true knowledge. A rising percent means the student can hear each sound, choose the right grapheme, and place the letters in order without extra sounds or missing parts.

It also shows if cumulative review is working, because older patterns must stay alive as new ones arrive.

Why it matters for student gains

Spelling is not just about neat papers. It is a mirror of decoding knowledge. When students can spell the patterns they read, it means the sound-symbol links are firm. This helps reading because the brain uses shared pathways for both.

Spelling also builds attention to each phoneme and grapheme, which reduces guessing in reading. Gains here often follow strong work in phonemic awareness and explicit phonics.

They also predict smoother writing, since students spend less energy on basic words and more on ideas. Parents notice, too. Visible improvement in spelling builds trust in your program and keeps motivation high.

How to measure it clearly

Give brief dictations once every one to two weeks. Include a mix of words from current and recent patterns, plus one review sentence to check conventions. Say the word, use it in a sentence, say the word again, then allow a short writing time.

Score with a simple key that gives credit for accurate pattern use, even if handwriting is messy.

Convert to a percent and track the gain across the term. Note common misses, such as dropped endings or vowel team mix-ups, and use that list to plan next week’s review.

How to raise mastery through purposeful encoding

Pair every decoding lesson with a tiny dictation. Keep it fast and focused. Have students tap or map sounds first, then write, then read back their word. Use immediate, clear feedback that points to the exact grapheme.

Practice high-utility patterns often, like inflectional endings and common vowel teams. Rotate quick “fix and try again” moments where students correct one letter, rewrite the word, and re-read it.

Send home a mini list of three to five words that match the week’s pattern with a one-minute practice routine families can follow. As encoding gets sharper, reading grows steadier and the whole literacy block gains power.

22. Vocabulary percentile rank lift (points)

What this stat means

Vocabulary percentile rank lift shows how many points a student moves up compared to peers on a normed vocabulary measure. It reflects how many word meanings the student knows and can use.

This includes both general academic words and words tied to the texts you teach. A lift means the student is catching up or moving ahead relative to age or grade-level norms. While phonics powers access to words, vocabulary powers meaning.

Tracking this number tells you if your language work is doing its job.

Why it matters for student gains

Even with strong decoding, comprehension suffers if students do not know the words they read. Vocabulary knowledge supports fluency, phrasing, and the ability to infer meaning. It also lifts writing and speaking, which feeds back into reading through richer background knowledge.

As vocabulary rank rises, students can handle more complex texts, follow instructions better, and feel comfortable in class talk. This leads to stronger comprehension scores and better performance across subjects.

Vocabulary also fuels joy. Knowing words makes reading feel like discovery, not struggle.

How to measure it clearly

Use a brief, reliable measure two to three times per year. Record percentile ranks rather than raw scores so growth is clear even when forms change. Track class averages and individual lifts, especially for students receiving extra language support.

Pair the data with notes on which words were taught in connected texts, science units, and social studies.

Look for patterns. If decoding is strong but vocabulary rank is flat, you likely need more intentional language work tied to content knowledge and read-alouds.

How to raise vocabulary with rich input and use

Read aloud daily from knowledge-rich texts a bit above students’ independent level. Pre-teach a few high-value words with quick, kid-friendly meanings and gestures. Revisit the same words across the week in short oral routines.

Use fast retrieval games where students explain, act, or draw the word in ten seconds. Tie new words to old words and to real experiences. Encourage simple oral summaries that must include target words.

Send home a tiny family card with three words and prompts to use them in dinner talk. Keep it joyful and brief. When words are heard often and used often, percentile ranks climb and comprehension follows.

23. Reading comprehension scale score growth (points)

What this stat means

Reading comprehension scale score growth reflects change on a standardized comprehension measure that uses scale scores for fair comparison over time. It shows if students can make sense of connected text, answer questions, and use evidence.

Growth here sits on top of many skills, including decoding, fluency, vocabulary, and background knowledge. Because it blends many parts, movement can feel slower than on early skills, but it is the end goal of reading. Tracking growth helps you see if your full system is working.

Why it matters for student gains

Comprehension is why we read. When scale scores rise, students can learn from text in every subject. They can follow directions, solve problems, and enjoy stories. This boosts confidence and performance across the day.

Growth also shows that decoding gains are transferring to meaning. If decoding and ORF improve but comprehension does not, you need more work on vocabulary, knowledge, and question types. When all move together, you have balance.

Families and school boards care deeply about comprehension data. Clear growth builds trust and supports continued investment in quality instruction.

How to measure it clearly

Use a consistent measure two to three times a year. Record scale scores and standard errors so you know whether changes are real. Analyze item types. Note whether students struggle with main idea, detail, inference, or vocabulary-in-context.

Pair the scores with classroom work like written responses and discussions. Group results by decoding level to see if comprehension is limited by word reading or by knowledge gaps.

Share findings with teachers in plain language and plan next steps that adjust both the input (what students read) and the tasks (what students do with the reading).

How to raise growth with balanced practice

Keep word reading strong, then build knowledge and reasoning. Use content-rich units with connected texts so students learn new facts while practicing reading. Teach short routines for finding key ideas, tracking text evidence, and summarizing in a few clear sentences.

Preview two or three words and one key concept before each read. Model think-alouds that show how to connect sentences and make inferences. Give students frequent chances to write brief, evidence-based responses so they practice explaining their thinking.

As decoding, vocabulary, and knowledge grow together, scale scores rise in a solid, lasting way.

24. DIBELS composite increase (points)

What this stat means

The DIBELS composite is a combined score built from several quick measures of early literacy, such as phonemic awareness, letter naming, decoding, and oral reading fluency. An increase in this score shows broad improvement across key reading skills.

Because it blends parts, the composite gives a fast view of overall risk and helps you see whether students are on track for later success.

Tracking point increases over weeks and terms tells you if your tier one instruction and interventions are moving the full skill set, not just one piece.

Why it matters for student gains

A rising composite means multiple engines are turning at once. Students are hearing sounds more clearly, mapping them to print, reading new words faster, and handling connected text with more ease.

This lowers risk levels and increases the percent of students at or above benchmark. The composite is also useful for equity. It highlights whether gains are shared across grades and groups or limited to a few.

When the whole curve shifts up, you are changing daily experiences for many students, not just a few outliers.

How to measure it clearly

Assess on a set schedule and record composite points along with the parts that feed it. Compare increases by classroom, grade, and risk band. Look for patterns, such as strong growth in decoding but flat growth in fluency, and plan targeted shifts.

Use simple graphs that show average composite points by month and the percent of students moving bands. Pair the composite with fidelity data, like pass rates and explicit phonics minutes, so you can connect delivery to outcomes.

When the composite dips, check attendance, schedule shifts, or staffing changes that may have disrupted routines.

How to raise the composite with aligned moves

Tighten the core routines that most affect the composite: daily phonemic awareness, explicit phonics with cumulative review, decodable reading, and brief repeated readings for fluency.

Ensure small-group time targets exact gaps shown in the subtests. Protect minutes for each block and remove low-yield activities that eat time. Keep corrections crisp, materials prepped, and transitions fast so students get many clean reps.

Share composite graphs with staff and celebrate small, steady climbs. When instruction is aligned end to end, composite points rise and more students move into safe zones.

25. MAP Reading RIT growth (points)

What this stat means

MAP Reading RIT growth measures change in a scale score from the MAP assessment. The RIT scale allows fair comparisons across grades and seasons. Growth here reflects a mix of word reading, vocabulary, and comprehension skills.

Because MAP adapts to the student, it can show gains for both struggling and advanced readers.

Tracking point growth each season helps you see whether your instruction is moving students faster than typical norms and whether gaps are closing.

Why it matters for student gains

RIT growth is a known signal for readiness in later grades. When students add more points than expected, they are catching up or moving ahead. This shows that daily routines, small-group instruction, and interventions are working in concert.

Strong growth supports better outcomes in content areas that rely on reading, like science and social studies.

It also helps with goal setting. Teachers can set clear, numeric goals with students and celebrate each step, which builds motivation and a sense of control.

How to measure it clearly

Test on the district timeline and record both the scale score and the conditional growth index so you can see growth relative to norms. Analyze strands to spot weak areas, such as informational text or vocabulary.

Review growth by grade, class, and risk band. Pair the data with classroom measures like NWF, ORF, and decoding accuracy to locate the true limiter. If students decode well but RIT growth is low, increase knowledge-rich reading and vocabulary.

If decoding is weak, strengthen phonics and decodable practice first.

How to raise RIT growth with focused inputs

Keep foundational work strong, then expand daily time in complex, knowledge-building texts with clear support. Teach students to annotate simply, track main ideas, and answer questions with evidence. Pre-teach a few high-value words and critical background facts before each read.

Use short, frequent writing about reading to deepen understanding. Align small-group work to strand data so time targets the biggest needs. Share individual RIT goals with students and mark progress after each unit.

With steady, aligned practice, RIT points climb and students feel the progress they are making.

26. Percent at/above benchmark (pre vs. post, percentage points)

What this stat means

Percent at or above benchmark tells you how many students meet the expected score for their grade at two points in time, such as the start and the end of a term. You then look at the percentage-point change.

If forty percent met benchmark in September and sixty eight percent did in March, the gain is twenty eight points. This number is clear and powerful because it answers a family’s most basic question.

How many children in this grade are on track right now? It also helps leaders see if your Science of Reading work is lifting the whole group, not just a few students.

Why it matters for student gains

Benchmarks connect daily teaching to big goals. When more students cross the line, the class can move through texts with less strain, and teachers can spend less time firefighting basic errors. This improves morale and learning across subjects.

A rising percent at benchmark also means fewer students need Tier 2 or Tier 3 time, which frees resources for those who truly need them. Because this stat is simple and public, it builds trust.

Teachers can point to real movement, families can cheer progress, and students can feel proud of being “on track.” When the line does not move, it is a signal to adjust minutes, materials, or coaching right away.

How to measure it clearly

Pick one trusted measure for each grade and keep the benchmark cut scores stable for the school year. Test on a set window, score the same day, and post the numbers by grade, classroom, and risk band.

Track both the overall percentage and the movement in and out of each band. Note attendance, new enrollments, and schedule changes so you can explain shifts. Pair the benchmark rate with fidelity data, such as explicit phonics minutes and decodable usage rate, so patterns are visible.

Aim to share a short story with the data. What changed in instruction between pre and post that likely moved the line?

How to raise the percent quickly and fairly

Tighten tier one instruction first. Protect daily time for phonemic awareness, explicit phonics with cumulative review, and decodable reading. Increase coaching in the grades with the lowest benchmark rates and run two-week sprints focused on one routine, such as clean corrections or higher response rates.

Add short, daily small groups for students just below the line and align the texts to the exact patterns they need. Use weekly progress checks and adjust groups fast.

Celebrate each classroom that moves even five points and have them share one concrete move others can copy. Many small, steady improvements add up to large percentage-point gains.

27. Percent moving from high-risk to low-risk (percentage points)

What this stat means

This stat shows how many students shift from the highest risk category to the safe or low-risk category over a set period. It focuses on the children who are most at risk for long-term reading problems.

If twenty five percent of your grade started in high risk and by spring ten percent are still there, you moved fifteen percentage points out of high risk.

This is a strong measure of equity and effectiveness because it shows whether your system is working for the students who need it most, not only for those near the benchmark line.

Why it matters for student gains

Moving students out of high risk changes life paths. It means they have built enough decoding and fluency to read daily texts with support, join class discussions, and feel successful. This shift boosts confidence and lowers behavior struggles that often come from frustration.

It also reduces the load on special services, allowing targeted help for students with the greatest needs. For staff, seeing this movement keeps hope high and energy strong. It proves that with the right routines, minutes, and feedback, even large gaps can close.

When this percentage does not move, it is a sign to check fidelity in Tier 2, group sizes, coaching dosage, and the match between texts and taught patterns.

How to measure it clearly

Use consistent cut scores to define risk bands and keep them stable across the year. Record the number of students in high risk at baseline and track each student monthly. Chart the net movement out of high risk and also the inflow, since new students may arrive below grade level.

Disaggregate by grade, classroom, attendance, and intervention access. Pair the movement with intervention fidelity data so you can link delivery to results.

Keep a short profile list of students who have not moved after eight weeks of strong intervention and bring those cases to a problem-solving team.

How to raise movement with precision

Start with a clean Tier 2 schedule that protects minutes and caps groups at three to five students. Align every session to a narrow skill target shown by data. Use decodables and word lists that heavily feature that target.

Keep the pace brisk and the number of student responses high, correcting errors in under ten seconds. Add an extra five-minute micro-session during the day for students far below, such as a quick blending line or dictation burst.

Recheck progress every two weeks and adjust groups right away. Share quick wins in staff huddles so strong routines spread. With tight focus and steady coaching, more students exit high risk and stay out.

28. Effect size for student gains (Cohen’s d)

What this stat means

Effect size tells you how big your student gains are, not just whether they are statistically real. Cohen’s d expresses the size of the change in standard deviation units, which makes it easy to compare across grades and measures.

A d of 0.2 is small, 0.5 is medium, and 0.8 or higher is large. In plain words, effect size answers this question. By how much did our instruction change outcomes compared to where students started or compared to a similar group without the change?

This makes it a powerful tool for judging the true punch of your Science of Reading work.

Why it matters for student gains

Percentages and raw point gains can look big or small depending on the test and the time window. Effect size levels the field. It lets you see whether your improvements are modest nudges or meaningful shifts in learning.

Large effects mean students are likely to feel the difference in daily reading, not just on a chart. This clarity helps you make smart choices about where to invest time and money. If a coaching model or a specific routine delivers a larger effect than another, you can scale the winner and retire the rest.

Over time, chasing large, repeatable effects drives stronger reading outcomes for more students.

How to measure it clearly

Choose the measure you care about, such as NWF, ORF, or the DIBELS composite. Calculate the mean and standard deviation at baseline and again after the implementation window. Use Cohen’s d to express the difference, either from pre to post within the same group or against a matched comparison group.

Report the effect with a simple confidence note so readers know the estimate’s stability. Disaggregate by grade and risk band because effects can differ across groups.

Pair the effect size with key fidelity stats like coaching dosage and pass rate to tell a full story about what likely drove the change.

How to raise effect size through design

Design for practice density and feedback quality. Increase correct student responses per minute during phonics, decodables, and fluency work. Shorten teacher talk, tighten transitions, and script clean corrections.

Protect daily minutes for the routines that matter most and align small groups to exact gaps. Ensure intervention groups meet often and follow the sequence as written. Layer in quick progress checks and adjust instruction within forty eight hours when growth stalls.

When the day is packed with accurate, immediate practice across many classrooms, gains stack up and your effect size grows from small to large.

29. Achievement gap closure (percentage-point reduction)

What this stat means

Achievement gap closure shows how much the distance shrinks between two groups of students on a clear reading measure. You pick a fair, stable metric, such as percent at benchmark or an average scale score.

Then you compare groups, like students with and without risk, multilingual learners and native speakers, or different demographic groups. The gap is the difference in their results. The percentage-point reduction tells you how much that difference has narrowed over a set period.

If one group had thirty percent at benchmark and another had sixty percent, the gap was thirty points. If later it is forty five percent and sixty five percent, the gap is twenty points, so you closed ten points.

This number puts equity into action. It asks if our Science of Reading work is helping those who most need it, not only those already near the line.

Why it matters for student gains

Reading access changes life chances. When gaps close, more students can read grade-level text, join lessons with confidence, and show what they know in every subject. Closing gaps early prevents years of frustration and costly remediation.

It also shows that daily routines, minutes, and coaching are reaching every child, including those with less background knowledge, less stable attendance, or who are learning English. A shrinking gap lifts the whole school culture.

Teachers see that effort pays off in fair outcomes. Families trust the system because they see gains for all groups, not just for some. Over time, gap closure predicts stronger graduation outcomes and broader opportunities for students.

How to measure it clearly

Choose one or two priority measures that link to your goals, such as DIBELS percent at benchmark or ORF WCPM averages. Define groups in a way that aligns with your district reporting, then keep the grouping rules stable for the year.

Record baseline gaps and check them each term. Track both the raw gap and the change in percentage points. Note any shifts in enrollment that could affect the numbers, such as new students arriving midyear with different profiles.

Pair the gap data with fidelity stats by group. For example, check if multilingual learners received the same decodable usage rate or small-group minutes. Look for bright spots where the gap narrowed the most and study the moves used in those classrooms.

How to raise gap closure with targeted support

Design the day so students who are behind get more high-quality practice, not just more time. Keep whole-group instruction clear and brisk, then add short, daily small groups that match exact needs, like blending, vowel teams, or phrasing.

Use decodables aligned to the scope and sequence so practice is fair and frequent. Protect Tier 2 minutes and keep groups small, with fast, precise corrective feedback. For multilingual learners, pre-teach key vocabulary and simple background facts before reading so decoding gains connect to meaning.

Offer micro-sessions during the day, like two-minute blending lines, to increase correct reps without fatigue. Train coaches to watch for equity in access, not only in delivery. Share classroom stories where a group’s gap shrank and name the exact steps that made it happen.

At Debsie, we help teams map these steps into a simple weekly rhythm so every child gets what they need to grow. If you want a quick plan for your school, book a free trial session and we will outline the first two weeks for you.

30. On-track to grade-level by year-end (% of students)

What this stat means

On-track to grade-level by year-end is the percent of students who are positioned to meet or pass the end-of-year reading benchmark based on their current progress. It is a forward-looking signal.

You set clear interim checkpoints for each term that align with your final benchmark. Students who meet or exceed those checkpoints are considered on track. This stat blends where students are now with how fast they are growing.

It helps leaders and teachers steer in time, because it points to who needs an extra push while there is still room to change the ending of the year.

Why it matters for student gains

Reading growth is a race against the calendar. If we wait for the final test to worry, it is too late. Tracking on-track status keeps action close to the present. When more students are on track early, schools can focus on maintaining gains and sharpening comprehension rather than catching up from behind.

This lowers stress and raises joy in the literacy block. It also supports smart resource use. You can direct coaching, small-group minutes, and Tier 2 time to the exact students who are off track right now. Families appreciate this clarity.

They hear, in plain words, whether their child is on a safe path and what the plan is if not.

How to measure it clearly

Define term checkpoints using your chosen measures, such as DIBELS composite, ORF, or MAP RIT. Use historical data or trusted norms to set realistic thresholds that predict end-of-year success.

After each progress cycle, mark each student as on track or off track and record the percent by grade and class. Track movement into and out of on-track status following instructional changes.

Pair the data with instruction logs, such as explicit phonics minutes, decodable usage, and small-group dosage, to see what patterns move students onto the path. Keep a simple, student-facing chart so learners can see their target and celebrate each step closer.

How to raise the on-track percent with steady execution

Protect the daily foundation first. Keep phonemic awareness short and brisk, explicit phonics clear and cumulative, decodable reading aligned, and fluency practice purposeful. Run small groups every day for students just below the line with texts and word lists that match their exact gaps.

Add quick progress checks each week and shift groups within forty eight hours when growth stalls. Script corrections so fixes are fast and clean. Share on-track data with students in gentle, hopeful language and set tiny goals for the next check, like three more corrects per minute or one more accurate vowel team.

Bring families into the plan with a one-minute home routine they can follow. Celebrate each classroom that moves the on-track percent up, and spread their exact routines across the grade.

At Debsie, we help schools build these simple, repeatable rhythms so the on-track line rises month by month. If you want hands-on help to lift your numbers this term, try a free Debsie class and get a clear next-step map for your team.

Conclusion

Strong reading grows from steady teaching done well every day. The Science of Reading gives us the steps. Fidelity makes those steps real in the classroom. Data shows if the steps are working for every child.

When we track clear metrics, teach the routines as designed, and adjust quickly, students move. They read more words right, they read them faster, and they understand what they read. Confidence rises. Joy returns to the literacy block.

Other Research Reports By Debsie:

• Top 5 Chess Coaching Academies in Fratton, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
• Top 5 Chess Coaching Academies in Tilehurst, Reading, United Kingdom
• Top 5 Chess Coaching Academies in Normanton, Derby, United Kingdom
• Discord/Snapchat/WhatsApp While Studying: Focus—Stat Check
• Teacher Tech Minutes: In-Class Screen Time vs Achievement—Stats
• Digital Detox Weeks: Screen Reduction & Grade Lift—Stats
• Online Lessons vs In-Person: Extra Screen Hours—Stats
• Algorithm “For You” Feeds: Engagement & Time Spent — Data
• Parental Controls & App Limits: What Actually Works — Data Deep Dive
• Phone Bans at School: Behavior, Focus, Incidents — Stat Snapshot